Toldot
3 Kislev 5773 / Nov.
16-17, 2012
In this week’s portion, Toldot,
we find the bulk of Isaac’s life. From his
wife Rebecca being barren for almost 20 years, to the birth of his twin sons, to
pretending Rebecca was his sister to save his life, to amassing great wealth,
to being upset at his son Esau’s intermarriage, and to eventually being tricked
in his old (vision-impaired) age into blessing his younger twin Jacob with the
blessing he intended to give to his older twin Esau before passing away.
Why would Isaac need to amass great wealth if, as the Torah
says, he was the primary inheritor of Abraham’s extensive wealth?
How could both Isaac and his father Abraham have encountered
so similar a situation that they would each react by pretending his wife was
his sister?
It is these kinds of questions that have driven the research
efforts of Torah commentators for millennia.
There are some who actually believe that Abraham and Isaac
may have been the same person, rather than father and son, due to the intense similarity
of their respective lives. From marrying
within the extended family, to having a spouse who struggled to bear children,
to pretending his wife was his sister to save his life, to amassing great
wealth, Isaac’s life in many ways mirrored that of his father Abraham’s.
But, you might ask, how could Abraham and Isaac possibly have
been the same person, given the story of the Akeidah – where Abraham is about to sacrifice Isaac (implying there
are at least 2 people involved in that situation)? Many of our Muslim brethren actually
believe that it was not Isaac, but rather his older brother Ishmael, whom
Abraham was prepared to sacrifice.
I’m not in any way trying to make a case for events having
taken place one way vs. another (and even that statement makes an arguably
unfair assumption that the Torah is a factual telling of history as opposed to our
collected cultural mythology). Rather, what
I find to be the interesting takeaway piece here, given the discomfort many
feel with suggesting Abraham and Isaac might have been the same person due to
their similar life experiences, is the value that we today place on living
individual lives.
Individuality is something that most of us strive to
attain. We don’t want to be lemmings,
simply following a path put before us without having the ability to question
and/or divert from it. And yet, many of
us strive to be just like our parents.
Historically, it fell on the father to teach his son a trade, and often
times, it was the trade the father had been engaged in. Even today, it is not uncommon to see grown children
learning from and subsequently taking over their parents’ businesses.
Some prime examples from the private sector:
Arthur Ochs Sulzberger Jr., the current publisher of the New
York Times, who followed his father Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, grandfather Arthur
Hays Sulzberger, and great-grandfather Adolph Ochs.
Prince Fielder, son of Cecil Fielder (both professional
baseball players).
Mickey Arison, the head of Carnival Cruise Lines, inherited
the business from his father, Ted Arison.
We find examples in the public sector as well:
George W. Bush, the former President of the United States,
and his father George H. W. Bush, the former President of the United States.
Mitt Romney, the former governor of Massachusetts, and his
father George, the former governor of Michigan.
John Dingell Jr., who took his father John Dingell Sr.’s
seat in Congress, representing parts of Detroit.
The Kennedy family.
Enough said.
While the examples provided above are all males, I’m sure
there are a number of (and that there will be a growing number of) female
examples as well.
Despite these examples (which often occur on a much more
local, small business level), a large number of grown children are reluctant to
step into their parents’ shoes, given their fears of being perceived as being
“just like their parents,” or as having benefitted from the hard work of their
parents without having to work hard on their own. Suggesting that Abraham and
Isaac were the same person offends the sensibilities of those who seek to
emulate their parents while still trying to live a life that is authentically
and distinguishably theirs.
Friedrich
Nietzsche, the German philosopher from the late 1800s, stated: “You
have your way. I have my way. As for the right way, the correct way, and
the only way, it does not exist.”
This Shabbat, reflect on what it means
to you to be an individual.
Think of the ways in which you emulate
your parents, both for better and for worse.
Recognize that we each, in our own way,
have the ability to live lives that are distinct, full of meaning, and full of
love.
No comments:
Post a Comment