Matot-Masei
28 Tammuz 5773 / July
5-6, 2013
In this week’s double portion, we come across one of the
more impressive conflict resolution scenarios in the Torah. Before entering the Promised Land, the tribes
of Reuben and Gad share with Moses that they’d prefer to take the land east of
the Jordan river, as it was fertile and would comfortably hold their
substantial flocks. Moses doesn’t
particularly like this idea, as the plan all along had been for all of the
Israelites to conquer the Promised Land, and then to draw lots to see where
each tribe would settle within it. So,
Moses loses his cool, scolds the Reubenites and Gadites: “Are your brothers to
go to war while you stay here?” He also
compares them to the scouts 40 years prior who returned with negative reports
of the Promised Land (due to fear), poisoning the will of the Israelites. On the eve of battle, Moses could hardly
allow for the Israelites to be made nervous…
However, instead of calamity, in response to Moses’s
concerns, the Reubenites and Gadites proposed what in the end turned out to be
a workable solution from Moses’s perspective: They’d quickly build pens for their flocks and cities for
their children, and then every single soldier from
the two tribes would accompany the Israelites into the Promised Land, and would
not return until after the entire land had been conquered. A fair compromise, no?
The ancient rabbis were not as kind in their
assessment. They viewed the Reubenites
and Gadites as being motivated by money (they pay particular attention to the
fact that the two tribes put their flocks before their children, when stating
“let us build pens for our flocks and cities for our children.”). Coupled with their lack of desire to settle
in the Promised Land, the ancient rabbis saw the Reubenites and Gadites as
worshipping wealth rather than God.
Too often, when facing potential conflicts, we get all
worked up (as Moses did) and entrench ourselves in positions, rather than
striving to identify underlying issues, and how best to address them. Moses likely would have framed his position
as: “you must enter the Promised Land.”
But his underlying issue was having the full Israelite force fight
together in order to have the best chance of conquering the Promised Land, per
God’s instructions. By identifying his
underlying issue, rather than by being distracted by his position, the
Reubenites and Gadites were able to offer a solution that was deemed acceptable by Moses.
This Shabbat, reflect on the conflicts that exist in your
life. Think about the positions taken by
both sides, and instead of dwelling on them, strive to identify the underlying
issues. Work towards resolution. Report back.
No comments:
Post a Comment